Ideally in this setup, the OWNER seek first the services of an Architect or Architectural firm. After the plans are prepared, the Architect invites contractor to bid for the project. At least 3 contractors should participate in the bidding. If the OWNER knows a capable contractor, he can also invite him to join the bidding. It is important that the Architect should be the one conducting the bidding because he can set bidding guides so that every item in the bid breakdown can be compared apple to apple during evaluation. Also, if the contractors has questions regarding the design, they can directly ask the architect. The architect then can issue bid bulletins to answer all design related questions.
While the bidding takes place, the OWNER can then hire a Construction Manager. It is recommended that the CM is not related in anyway with neither the Architect nor the Contractor. This is to ensure a good check and balance during construction.
After the bidding, the winning contractor will then be engaged directly to the OWNER. Although the contractor will be the one preparing the contract agreement, it is still to be checked and evaluated by the Construction Manager. All provisions, terms and conditions will be reviewed by the CM. You should not ask directly your contractor of anything about the contract agreement because it might give you a bias answer. If you have doubts and questions, it is your CM that you should consult. The CM and the Contractor may have a language that you might not understand. But you can be assured that the CM is doing his best to make everything in your favor. Otherwise, his reputation of being a good Construction Manager will be compromised.
Again, the advantages and disadvantages are actually almost the same with the previous setups. The only difference of this setup is having a very good check and balance because these 3 Construction Professionals are directly engaged with you. The Architect will ensure that his designs and details are complete, accurate and on time because the CM and the Contractor will be checking these before the contractor executes the plans. The Contractor will less likely attempt to perform poorly or abuse you because they are being monitored and checked by the CM. The CM on the other hand must also do well because the project's outcome mostly depend on him. If the project is done accordingly and finished on time, the credit goes to the CM. CM firms are always after this, because of client reference. In short, because each of them are afraid of having an impression of being incompetent, they will have to perform at their best. And the one that will benefit from this is the OWNER.
Showing posts with label Design and Architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Design and Architecture. Show all posts
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Contractor through the Architect
The Architect can actually directly recommend a contractor. But for the purpose of cost comparison and counter checking of estimates, several contractors are invited to bid by the architect. This is to show the client that he has options to choose. The OWNER can even recommend his bet contractor to participate in the bidding. You will not have to worry of finding and dealing with contractors since the architect will be the one handling the bidding.
After the project is awarded to the winning bidder, the setup or situation will most likely be the same as the previous setup. Basically the same advantages and disadvantages.
Some architectural firms are offering their in-house construction management where-in, they can assign a full time project architect that will monitor the contractor and manage progress of construction. You will then be paying monthly charges for this.
The following are in addition to the advantages and disadvantages mentioned in the previous setup:
ADVANTAGES:
1. You can request your Architect to do regular inspection or at least do checking on construction milestone. He can then help you in evaluating and advise you if your contractor's accomplishment claims are substantial or not. He or his representative can also do random material checking to make sure that the contractor is following the prepared specifications and not using substandard materials.
2. You can seek design related advise during construction. If you are in doubt of a certain detail or you promptly want to change something, you can directly tell the matter to the project architect. Replies would probably be faster and will not compromise construction schedule.
3. Because the contractor is recommended by the architect, there is a very good chance that the contractor is competent and reliable. He must have been proven his reputation already to the architect in his previous projects. So you will have less worries in the contractor's credibility.
4. You can expect that the contractor will also perform well because if not, the recommending architect might not give him projects anymore in the future.
5. Faster response on design revisions since the project architect has direct contact to the firm.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. You will pay extra cost for the construction management services of the Architect.
2. If the architect is the one checking the contractor, who is then checking the architect? We can not be 100% sure that the project architect can mange correctly and/or efficiently all the construction issues in the project. Often times, they tend to be bias and always thinks that everything should be in the architect's favor.
3. Sometimes, project architects tend to be too strict that even causes delays in schedule. Example, if a material in the specification is not available anymore or very hard to find, contractors find it hard to seek approval of alternative brands or specifications.
4. Contractor-Designer, conflict or connivance. Although this rarely happen nowadays, still problems like these may arise anytime during construction.
Engaging your architect to do management work will protect you from possible abuse by the contractor but will cost you additional expenses.
After the project is awarded to the winning bidder, the setup or situation will most likely be the same as the previous setup. Basically the same advantages and disadvantages.
Some architectural firms are offering their in-house construction management where-in, they can assign a full time project architect that will monitor the contractor and manage progress of construction. You will then be paying monthly charges for this.
The following are in addition to the advantages and disadvantages mentioned in the previous setup:
ADVANTAGES:
1. You can request your Architect to do regular inspection or at least do checking on construction milestone. He can then help you in evaluating and advise you if your contractor's accomplishment claims are substantial or not. He or his representative can also do random material checking to make sure that the contractor is following the prepared specifications and not using substandard materials.
2. You can seek design related advise during construction. If you are in doubt of a certain detail or you promptly want to change something, you can directly tell the matter to the project architect. Replies would probably be faster and will not compromise construction schedule.
3. Because the contractor is recommended by the architect, there is a very good chance that the contractor is competent and reliable. He must have been proven his reputation already to the architect in his previous projects. So you will have less worries in the contractor's credibility.
4. You can expect that the contractor will also perform well because if not, the recommending architect might not give him projects anymore in the future.
5. Faster response on design revisions since the project architect has direct contact to the firm.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. You will pay extra cost for the construction management services of the Architect.
2. If the architect is the one checking the contractor, who is then checking the architect? We can not be 100% sure that the project architect can mange correctly and/or efficiently all the construction issues in the project. Often times, they tend to be bias and always thinks that everything should be in the architect's favor.
3. Sometimes, project architects tend to be too strict that even causes delays in schedule. Example, if a material in the specification is not available anymore or very hard to find, contractors find it hard to seek approval of alternative brands or specifications.
4. Contractor-Designer, conflict or connivance. Although this rarely happen nowadays, still problems like these may arise anytime during construction.
Engaging your architect to do management work will protect you from possible abuse by the contractor but will cost you additional expenses.
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Contractor's In-house Design vs Architectural Firm's Design
Before we proceed on the next set-up, it is important that you first understand the difference between designs from an Architectural firm and designs by in-house designer of a Construction firm.
Many contractors nowadays already have in-house designers. So you can actually have the contractor make the design for you. But, you should be aware of the following;
1. When it comes to design expertise, design firms usually produces better designs than a contractor's in-house designer. Simply because the firm has a wider range of design resources, the firm allots more time in research and design improvement to keep them in trend and competent in all aspects of design. They already have a library of their design information, style evolution and compilation of reliable design solutions. They even have wider design exposure including in international design trends.
2. In-house designers are usually contractor-inclined. A design firm has the experience in dealing with their clients. They can easily understand the clients preferences according to their lifestyle and social status. In-house designers are usually young architects who knows architecture in theory but still lacks the experience in understanding their client since they rely mostly on their experience as a contractor and not as a designer. They focus more on constructing the house rather than understanding how the design works best to satisfy the needs of the client. Sure they can produce good designs, but designs produced by firms are probably better.
3. Even if the contractor tells you that they will be giving you the design for free, it may not be actually free at all. The charge may be indirectly included in the contract bid.
4. Drawing quality, accuracy and completeness is strict in every architectural firm. They make sure that the details are complete and precise. In house designers on the other hand focuses only on the drawing requirements and thinks that other drawings can be made later as the construction progresses.
5. And of course, if your house is designed by a known architect, you can brag about it! And of course, you will spend more since you will be paying design services separately.
I've stated the above points because you might be asking why you will need the services of a design firm if contractors can already prepare designs.
Many contractors nowadays already have in-house designers. So you can actually have the contractor make the design for you. But, you should be aware of the following;
1. When it comes to design expertise, design firms usually produces better designs than a contractor's in-house designer. Simply because the firm has a wider range of design resources, the firm allots more time in research and design improvement to keep them in trend and competent in all aspects of design. They already have a library of their design information, style evolution and compilation of reliable design solutions. They even have wider design exposure including in international design trends.
2. In-house designers are usually contractor-inclined. A design firm has the experience in dealing with their clients. They can easily understand the clients preferences according to their lifestyle and social status. In-house designers are usually young architects who knows architecture in theory but still lacks the experience in understanding their client since they rely mostly on their experience as a contractor and not as a designer. They focus more on constructing the house rather than understanding how the design works best to satisfy the needs of the client. Sure they can produce good designs, but designs produced by firms are probably better.
3. Even if the contractor tells you that they will be giving you the design for free, it may not be actually free at all. The charge may be indirectly included in the contract bid.
4. Drawing quality, accuracy and completeness is strict in every architectural firm. They make sure that the details are complete and precise. In house designers on the other hand focuses only on the drawing requirements and thinks that other drawings can be made later as the construction progresses.
5. And of course, if your house is designed by a known architect, you can brag about it! And of course, you will spend more since you will be paying design services separately.
I've stated the above points because you might be asking why you will need the services of a design firm if contractors can already prepare designs.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Construction Professionals
In my previous post "An Overview", my aim is for non-technical people to understand the roles of individuals in construction. But the question that follows is "Who's who?"
Note that this article will only focus on Construction in general.
FIELDS IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY
1. Design - Professionals in this field are the ones conceptualizing and preparing the plans. Design is composed of Architectural, Structural, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Specialized Allied (Interior, Acoustics, Lighting, etc.)
An Architectural design firm is usually headed by the principal architect. The firm is composed of architects, engineers, draftsmen(now CAD operators and 3D Renderers), Architectural design firms usually has consultants. They are the designers of the other trades mentioned above. They are not directly part of the firm but merely Partners in the business. A firm may actually have several consultants on each field.
Professionals of each trade:
Architectural - Architect, Interior Designer, Landscape Architect
Structural - Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer
Electrical - Registered Electrical Engineer, Professional Electrical Engineer, Registered Master Electrician
Plumbing - Sanitary Engineer, Registered Master Plumber
Mechanical - Mechanical Engineer, HVAC Engineer
Specialized Allied - Interior Designer, Interior Decorator, Acoustic Engineer, etc.
2. Contractor - Mostly composed of Engineers but there are some architects on board also. The contractor is the one in the site doing the construction works. Contractor or constructor has classes. This gauges their capability to handle size and complexity of a project. Contractors of multi-storey buildings should be a Tripple-A General Contractor. For residential projects, even class C or D are qualified depending on their performance.
Sub-contractors are usually hired by the General Contractor for a specific work in the construction. This can be Electrical works or Plumbing works, etc. Subcontractors are also considered as standalone contractors. They are only called sub-contractors if they are under the General contractor and does not have direct contract with the client.
3. Project/Construction Management - The Construction Manager is considered as the OWNER's representative, This can also be composed of a team of professionals depending on the scale and complexity of a project. In most residential and small commercial projects, there is usually one full-time construction manager but he is assisted by other trade consultants as needed. They are the ones managing the project, setting and monitoring of the schedule, checking of the materials and contractor's workmanship quality, review of the plans, contracts and other documents and coordinates with the Designer as necessary, making sure also that the plans are strictly implemented. They are also the ones assisting the OWNER of his responsibilities as well. As I've mentioned before, his main duty is to protect the OWNER's interest. He makes sure that the Contractor is doing his job faithfully and evaluates the accomplishments for payment. He fills up the owner's lack of technical knowledge to avoid being abused by the contractor. A construction manager can be an architect or engineer with years of experience in the industry.
4. Product Development and Sales - Some engineers chose the path of specializing in a specific construction material. Instead of involving directly in construction, they develop materials and services for use in buildings.
5. Government Service - Engineers, architects working in DPWH and other related government institution. Professionals in the office of the Building official and City Engineer and City planning and development.
6. Maintenance and Administrative - Often times, as a new building is completed, the OWNER absorbs one of the Construction Managers to be his Building Administrator. This is to take advantage of his knowledge on the construction history of the building. There are also new firms today that offer maintenance works only.
Construction is actually broader. But I believe the above explains the basics.
The question next is who to contact first if you want to build your house? I will be discussing this later. It is important that the CLIENT first understand the different construction setup. Please read my next post regarding this.
Note that this article will only focus on Construction in general.
FIELDS IN THE BUILDING INDUSTRY
1. Design - Professionals in this field are the ones conceptualizing and preparing the plans. Design is composed of Architectural, Structural, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Specialized Allied (Interior, Acoustics, Lighting, etc.)
An Architectural design firm is usually headed by the principal architect. The firm is composed of architects, engineers, draftsmen(now CAD operators and 3D Renderers), Architectural design firms usually has consultants. They are the designers of the other trades mentioned above. They are not directly part of the firm but merely Partners in the business. A firm may actually have several consultants on each field.
Professionals of each trade:
Architectural - Architect, Interior Designer, Landscape Architect
Structural - Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer
Electrical - Registered Electrical Engineer, Professional Electrical Engineer, Registered Master Electrician
Plumbing - Sanitary Engineer, Registered Master Plumber
Mechanical - Mechanical Engineer, HVAC Engineer
Specialized Allied - Interior Designer, Interior Decorator, Acoustic Engineer, etc.
2. Contractor - Mostly composed of Engineers but there are some architects on board also. The contractor is the one in the site doing the construction works. Contractor or constructor has classes. This gauges their capability to handle size and complexity of a project. Contractors of multi-storey buildings should be a Tripple-A General Contractor. For residential projects, even class C or D are qualified depending on their performance.
Sub-contractors are usually hired by the General Contractor for a specific work in the construction. This can be Electrical works or Plumbing works, etc. Subcontractors are also considered as standalone contractors. They are only called sub-contractors if they are under the General contractor and does not have direct contract with the client.
3. Project/Construction Management - The Construction Manager is considered as the OWNER's representative, This can also be composed of a team of professionals depending on the scale and complexity of a project. In most residential and small commercial projects, there is usually one full-time construction manager but he is assisted by other trade consultants as needed. They are the ones managing the project, setting and monitoring of the schedule, checking of the materials and contractor's workmanship quality, review of the plans, contracts and other documents and coordinates with the Designer as necessary, making sure also that the plans are strictly implemented. They are also the ones assisting the OWNER of his responsibilities as well. As I've mentioned before, his main duty is to protect the OWNER's interest. He makes sure that the Contractor is doing his job faithfully and evaluates the accomplishments for payment. He fills up the owner's lack of technical knowledge to avoid being abused by the contractor. A construction manager can be an architect or engineer with years of experience in the industry.
4. Product Development and Sales - Some engineers chose the path of specializing in a specific construction material. Instead of involving directly in construction, they develop materials and services for use in buildings.
5. Government Service - Engineers, architects working in DPWH and other related government institution. Professionals in the office of the Building official and City Engineer and City planning and development.
6. Maintenance and Administrative - Often times, as a new building is completed, the OWNER absorbs one of the Construction Managers to be his Building Administrator. This is to take advantage of his knowledge on the construction history of the building. There are also new firms today that offer maintenance works only.
Construction is actually broader. But I believe the above explains the basics.
The question next is who to contact first if you want to build your house? I will be discussing this later. It is important that the CLIENT first understand the different construction setup. Please read my next post regarding this.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)